The images shows the extent of violations | Image Credit: Whitefield Citizens Ward Committee

Whitefield woes: Just 3 km, nearly 250 illegal buildings

Bengaluru

A surprise inspection led by BBMP Zonal Commissioner of Mahadevapura zone, Ramesh K N on June 13, 2025, revealed shocking levels of unauthorised development in Whitefield. In just a 3-kilometre stretch covering MIMS Gulmohar Road, Athashri Road, Prithvi Layout, Pattandur Agrahara ECC Road, and ECC Road, nearly 200 to 250 buildings and sites were found to have serious legal violations — from unauthorised layouts and illegal constructions to rampant commercialisation in residential zones.

Also read: (Nature Vs Real Estate: Bengaluru forest’s 11 year battle captured on Google Earth)

The Commissioner immediately directed Shri Gururaj, Assistant Executive Engineer (AEE) of the Whitefield Sub Division, to initiate demolition of illegal structures and submit proof of action, including copies of notices issued, both to the Zonal Office and the concerned residents.

Also Read: (Dharmasthala deaths: 474 suicides in 12 years, 90 women among the dead in temple town, RTI reveals)

However, over three weeks later, residents say no tangible action has followed. The silence from the AEE’s office has sparked growing frustration and concern among citizens, who fear the rule of law is being blatantly ignored.

A detailed inspection report and follow-up document has been made publicly available here, outlining the scale of violations and proposed remedial actions.

But this incident has also triggered a deeper debate: Why did the Zonal Commissioner have to personally discover these violations? Shouldn’t local BBMP engineers — including Junior Engineers (JEs), Assistant Engineers (AEs), and AEEs — be proactively monitoring construction activities, as per BBMP norms? asked residents of Whitefield. 

BBMP circulars clearly state that engineers must routinely inspect construction sites, ensure permits are valid, and prevent illegal construction. Yet, enforcement appears to be weak or nonexistent. Many under-construction buildings do not display mandatory permit boards — a basic requirement that remains flouted with impunity. In contrast, other countries display full project details prominently at construction sites.

The inaction has raised uncomfortable questions about administrative efficiency and systemic integrity. Are the ward engineers under-equipped or unqualified to handle their responsibilities? Would placing KAS officers in charge of wards or subdivisions lead to better accountability?

With rising calls for structural reforms and stricter oversight, the Whitefield inspection has laid bare not just the extent of unauthorised construction, but also the glaring administrative lapses that enable it. Residents now await not only swift action from BBMP, but also clarity on how governance will be strengthened to prevent such breakdowns in future.

For more Bengaluru news developments click here

𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬
Copy Link

2 thoughts on “Whitefield woes: Just 3 km, nearly 250 illegal buildings

  1. If any illegal construction is done or violations are done and getting OC, khata etc then its the authorities who are responsible and should be prosecuted.
    If there will be stay order or demolition order on such construction, what about the people who has purchased those properties? How can someone know if there is violation by reputed builders like Prestige and even OC, khata has been received? Why People who are investing their hard earned money should suffer?
    Either they have to be compensated by builder or by BBMP or BDA.
    If authorities are not able to curb such proliferations then its their inefficiency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *