Representative Image of accused Chinnayya
Chinnayya took SIT for a ride, showed wrong spots, finds probe
Bengaluru
Chinnayya, accused in the Dharmasthala mass burial case, misled the Special Investigation Team (SIT) by showing incorrect burial spots. The probe has now confirmed that he deliberately pointed out wrong locations, though the reason behind this remains unclear.
A highly placed source in the Home Ministry told blrpost.com, “from day one of the spot identification process, he started deceiving the investigation team. He deliberately misled them and showed false locations. This is why the exhumation did not yield the expected results. The SIT uncovered this during the course of the investigation.”
Chinnayya, who filed a complaint at Dharmasthala police station on July 3 alleging he was forced to bury bodies illegally, expressed shock when skeletal remains were found at the sixth spot. As soon as the remains were discovered, he said, “this was not buried by me.” This reaction suggested he was himself surprised to see remains at that location. At another spot, identified as 11A, skeletal remains were found on the surface — a site he had not revealed.
The source further suggested it was possible that someone may have contacted Chinnayya before the operation and instructed him to mislead investigators, though the SIT has not yet found evidence to confirm this. Chinnayya also misled Soujanya activists, proving himself to be a fraud. “He took everyone for a ride, not just the SIT. He single-handedly caused significant damage to the case. But the SIT is working day and night to bring out the truth, conducting the investigation very fairly,” the source added.
Chinnayya was arrested on charges of perjury and forgery on August 23 and interrogated for several days before being sent to judicial custody. The SIT has collected substantial information from him. Investigators also questioned Soujanya activists, including Girish Mattannavar, Vittal Gowda, and others. Two mahajars were conducted at Bangle Gudde, the site where Vittal Gowda had brought a skull. During these inspections, seven skeletal remains were found. Later, the SIT carried out a forest search and recovered several more remains, including skulls, along with some identity cards.

If SIT finds chinnayya showing wrong spots then where is the correct spots? If these allegations true SIT must show correct spots and exume human remains then only it is proves.
ಈ ಪ್ರಕರಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಚಿನ್ನಯ್ಯ ಯಾಕೆ ಯು-ಟರ್ನ್ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದು ತುಂಬಾ ಸುಲಭ. ಅವನು ತೋರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಂತೆ ಪಶ್ಚಾತ್ತಾಪದಿಂದ ಮುಂದೆ ಬಂದವನಲ್ಲ. ಅವನ ಉದ್ದೇಶ ಬೇಗನೆ ಹಣ ಗಳಿಸುವುದೇ. ಯಾರಾದರೂ ನಿಜವಾದ ಪಶ್ಚಾತ್ತಾಪದಿಂದ ಮುಂದೆ ಬಂದರೆ, ಯಾವುದೇ ಒತ್ತಡಕ್ಕೆ, ಪ್ರಲೋಭನೆಗೆ ಅಥವಾ ಲಾಭಕ್ಕೆ ಅವರು ಹಿಂದೆ ಸರಿಯುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ ಚಿನ್ನಯ್ಯಗೆ ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟವಾಗಿ ಗೊತ್ತಿತ್ತು — ಶಕ್ತಿಶಾಲಿ ಜನರನ್ನು ಬ್ಲ್ಯಾಕ್ಮೇಲ್ ಮಾಡಿದರೆ ತಾನು ಕೊಲ್ಲಲ್ಪಡುವೆನೆಂದು. ಅದಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಅವನು ಸೋಜನ್ಯಾ ಬೆಂಬಲಿಗರ ಬಳಿ ಸೇರಿದನು. ಏಕೆಂದರೆ, ಅಲ್ಲಿ ತಾನು ಒಂದು ಕಡೆ ಸುರಕ್ಷಿತವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು, ಮತ್ತೊಂದು ಕಡೆ ಶಕ್ತಿಶಾಲಿ ಜನರು ತಾನೇ ಸಂಪರ್ಕಿಸುವ ಪರಿಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಬರಬಹುದು ಎಂಬ ಲೆಕ್ಕ ಹಾಕಿದ್ದ.
ಅವನು ಪಶ್ಚಾತ್ತಾಪದಿಂದ ಮುಂದೆ ಬಂದಿದ್ದರೆ, ಮಹೇಶ್ ಶೆಟ್ಟಿ ಅವರನ್ನು ಭೇಟಿ ಮಾಡಲು ತನ್ನ ಹೆಂಡತಿಯನ್ನು ಎಂದಿಗೂ ಜೊತೆಗೂಡಿಸಿ ತರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಯಾವುದೇ ಹೆಂಡತಿ ತನ್ನ ಗಂಡನು ಅಪಾಯದಲ್ಲಿರಬೇಕೆಂದು ಬಯಸುವುದೇ ಸಹಜವಲ್ಲ. ಹಾಗೆಯೇ, ಅವನು ಶಕ್ತಿಶಾಲಿಗಳಿಂದ ಕಳುಹಿಸಲ್ಪಟ್ಟವನಲ್ಲ; ಹೀಗಿದ್ದರೆ ಅವನ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಇರುವ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ರಹಸ್ಯಗಳನ್ನು ಬಹಿರಂಗಪಡಿಸಿ ಅವರ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಇಷ್ಟು ಧೈರ್ಯವಾಗಿ ಮಾತನಾಡುವುದೇ ಇಲ್ಲ.
ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ಚಿನ್ನಯ್ಯನನ್ನು ಜೈಲಿನಿಂದ ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ ಮಾಡಬಾರದು. ಈ ಪ್ರಕರಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಅವನು ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಅಪಾಯಕಾರಿ.